Before I was saved I had a Catholic Bible. Ecclesiasticus was there but you won't find it in a Christian Bible. That's why it's not in the KJV. It's apocryphal. The 1611 King James Bible did have it written separately with a header that read "Apocryphal books." Later on these were further examined (as we know there were a few revisions afterward to the King James Bible). It was eventually determined that there was no reason to keep them in as they're not inspired.
If you go back even further and study the dates in which scripture was written...every apocryphal books seems to be written long after where it should have been. That alone should have been reason for early Bibles to not include it and they were found separately to begin with.
It is evident that the accuser will find a "logical" way. Even adding the word cus .
The preacher would find this amusing if it were not real! Like the sands that are removed through time, such are these times of uncertainty! How hard is it to kick against the pricks of unbelief! Is not the word of God enough for us to learn? The archeology of a scroll with nothing but hot air my friend!
Hi Charles. Ecclesiasticus is considered an Old Testament Apocryphal book, one of many. This KJBO site lists them under the Tab, 'More', at the top of the page. Some present day Bibles contain the Apocrypha, chiefly the RC Edition & those used by the Orthodox Churches.
When the Canon of Scripture was formed, this book alongwith others, were considered suspect for various reasons (e.g. authorship, incorrect teaching when compared with accepted Scriptures, etc.). Not to say that there's no truth within them, but the fact of some errors within them, should give warning to either approach them carefully or not refer to them at all.
My King James Version of the Bible does not contain the book of Ecclesiacticus. Could you explain this?
I saw a twitter post using Ecclesiacticus 2:1. While I agree with the statement the verse makes, still it is not in the King James Version, mine or any other KJV I've ever read.
Both of those are on the red Link page you come into first.
The Apocrypha are books thst we're not canonized into the Bible. I've only read them once.
Explore everything out on the Link Page. Testimonies is a blessing. There's a wonderful Search Engine. It will fetch all scriptures on a single word. If it fetches a 1000 verses you may have to separate Old Testament from New Testament.
There are strong disputes between eastern and western Christianity one of those is the western version of the books the Bible, believe that some holy scriptures are not good enough to be in the Bible, some denominations disclaim there importance at all. In the east the books include other holy texts left out of the western bible. Check out Eastern Orthodoxy...
A person claims the book of Ecclesiasticus does not line up with remainder of bible because " This book claims that giving alms justifies a man. We know that only JESUS CHRIST justifies!" Now the Words of God will not be fully understood if its not read in the Spirit of God. The justification in the giving of alms lies in the heart of man. Mark 12: 43,44. Proverbs 3: 5,9. Proverbs 14: 30.
a place of solace to the weary mind a place of preparation for determined pilgrim for acceptable men are tested and tried in the furnance of adversity.
This is beautiful. Lord help me to cleave unto you and Your Word esp in times of tribulation. Please have mercy upon me and heal my infirmity. In Your only begotten Son's name YAHAWSHI I pray and cry out to You.
If you go back even further and study the dates in which scripture was written...every apocryphal books seems to be written long after where it should have been. That alone should have been reason for early Bibles to not include it and they were found separately to begin with.
The preacher would find this amusing if it were not real! Like the sands that are removed through time, such are these times of uncertainty! How hard is it to kick against the pricks of unbelief! Is not the word of God enough for us to learn? The archeology of a scroll with nothing but hot air my friend!
When the Canon of Scripture was formed, this book alongwith others, were considered suspect for various reasons (e.g. authorship, incorrect teaching when compared with accepted Scriptures, etc.). Not to say that there's no truth within them, but the fact of some errors within them, should give warning to either approach them carefully or not refer to them at all.
I saw a twitter post using Ecclesiacticus 2:1. While I agree with the statement the verse makes, still it is not in the King James Version, mine or any other KJV I've ever read.
Ecclesiastes is in the Bible.
Both of those are on the red Link page you come into first.
The Apocrypha are books thst we're not canonized into the Bible. I've only read them once.
Explore everything out on the Link Page. Testimonies is a blessing. There's a wonderful Search Engine. It will fetch all scriptures on a single word. If it fetches a 1000 verses you may have to separate Old Testament from New Testament.
Ecclesiastes that have 12 scriptures in my bible. But on here this book have I believe 40
chapters. I've been in church many years and do know about the Bible, but have never
seen this book before nor heard of it.
Do you have a Bible comment or question?
Please Sign In or Register to post comments...
Report Comment
Which best represents the problem with the comment?