Here's something new to you and maybe also to some others who strongly hold to one of the three concepts of God: The Lord will not condemn anyone solely on the basis that they had the wrong idea of Him because He has already said his ways and thoughts are higher than that of humans in Isa 55:8-9. So, He knows you struggle with the abstract concept of the Godhead (which should've been the non-inflammatory word used instead of Trinity). Btw, Jesus is the only Way
Even a Trinity pastor, on YouTube, once described and showed an illustration! of God as the three headed Cerebus of ancient Egyptian religion. It was so ignorant of a certified minister. Now, that in itself is insulting to God and could constitute heresy
Do you really know the definition of either heresy or rebellion? Definitions are not based on name calling those who disagree with you. (On this particular issue, regrettably the Roman Catholic Church started this childish name calling which they escalated into executing people)
GOD gave us all free will, within some boundaries. (That is too upsetting to a large section who are actually heretical). To continue, you may believe in a Unitarian God or the hybrid, and others may continue to believe in the Godhead. It is possible that none of these ideas are correct. It is even possible to change one's mind if one is not blinded by bias & dogma to really read scriptures as they are written. (My NIV Study Bible caused me to doubt the Godhead, so my scientific training made me test all those concepts)
Some church leaders taught wrongly that we simply find verses to support whatever concept or decision we've already prejudged. NO, we don't test the Bible for data. It's the other way around: Scriptures are what must be used to test even one's OWN pet theory ( Rom 12:2, you're supposed to let the words of God transform you - not the other way around). But in another misapplication of scripture: 2Tim 3:16 has become like Samurai swords in the hands of the immature
"And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent."
- John 17:3
Trinitarian, it is time to repent of this blatant heresy that God is a trinity. Being rebellious is as the sin of witchcraft.
Even a Trinity pastor, on YouTube, once described and showed an illustration! of God as the three headed Cerebus of ancient Egyptian religion. It was so ignorant of a certified minister. Now, that in itself is insulting to God and could constitute heresy
Do you really know the definition of either heresy or rebellion? Definitions are not based on name calling those who disagree with you. (On this particular issue, regrettably the Roman Catholic Church started this childish name calling which they escalated into executing people)
GOD gave us all free will, within some boundaries. (That is too upsetting to a large section who are actually heretical). To continue, you may believe in a Unitarian God or the hybrid, and others may continue to believe in the Godhead. It is possible that none of these ideas are correct. It is even possible to change one's mind if one is not blinded by bias & dogma to really read scriptures as they are written. (My NIV Study Bible caused me to doubt the Godhead, so my scientific training made me test all those concepts)
Some church leaders taught wrongly that we simply find verses to support whatever concept or decision we've already prejudged. NO, we don't test the Bible for data. It's the other way around: Scriptures are what must be used to test even one's OWN pet theory ( Rom 12:2, you're supposed to let the words of God transform you - not the other way around). But in another misapplication of scripture: 2Tim 3:16 has become like Samurai swords in the hands of the immature
- Matthew 11:15
Amen.
This comment thread is locked. Please enter a new comment below to start a new comment thread.
Note: Comment threads older than 2 months are automatically locked.
Do you have a Bible comment or question?
Please Sign In or Register to post comments...
Report Comment
Which best represents the problem with the comment?