(5) Jehoiakim . . . in Jerusalem.--2 Kings 23:36, adding the mother's name. here. So LXX.
And he did. . .the Lord.--2 Kings 23:37, which adds "according to all that his fathers had done." So LXX.
Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon.--Nabium-kudurri-ucur ("Nebo guard the crown! ") son of Nabopalassar, who had founded this dynasty by successful revolt against Assyria. His extant inscriptions chiefly relate to palace and temple building. Schrader gives a short inscription from a brick now in the Zrich Museum. "Nab--Kudurri-ucur, king of Babylon, restorer of Esagili and Ezida [two famous temples], son of Nab--abala-ucur, King of Babylon am I." No really historical inscription is known except a fragment relating to his Egyptian campaign in his 37th year (568 B.C. ), and an illegible one on the rocks of Nahr-el-Kelb near Beirut. The LXX. here interpolates the account of Jehoiakim's three years of vassalage, and his revolt against Nebuchadnezzar, and the other events and reflections contained in 2 Kings 24:1-4. The LXX. makes Jehoiakim, instead of Manasseh, "fill Jerusalem with innocent blood," contrary to the Hebrew text.
And bound him in fetters.--Two bronze (chains), as in 2 Chronicles 33:11.
To carry him to Babylon.--To make him go. It is not said that this intention was carried out. (Comp. 2 Chronicles 33:11, "and carried him to Babylon.") Nebuchadnezzar, who, according to Jeremiah 46:2, had defeated Necho in a great battle at Carchemish, in the 4th year of Jehoiakim, appears to have left the king of Judah to reign as a vassal-king, after inflicting upon him a severe humiliation. (The LXX., 3 Esdr., Vulg., and Arabic, but not the Syriac, read: "and carried him to Babylon.") Thenius says this must be the right reading, and then denies its claim to credibility. He further asserts that, "in order to allow ample scope for the fulfilment of the prophecy of Jeremiah" (see Note on 2 Chronicles 36:8), the chronicler has represented Jehoiakim as carried alive to Babylon in the last year of his reign. This statement rests not upon objective historical grounds, but upon subjective prejudices against the chronicler.
Daniel 1:1, by a transcriber's error, puts this first capture of Jerusalem by Nebuchadnezzar in the third year of Jehoiakim; whereas Nebuchadnezzar only became king in the fourth of Jehoiakim. (2 Kings 25:8; Jeremiah 25:1.)
36:1-21 The ruin of Judah and Jerusalem came on by degrees. The methods God takes to call back sinners by his word, by ministers, by conscience, by providences, are all instances of his compassion toward them, and his unwillingness that any should perish. See here what woful havoc sin makes, and, as we value the comfort and continuance of our earthly blessings, let us keep that worm from the root of them. They had many times ploughed and sowed their land in the seventh year, when it should have rested, and now it lay unploughed and unsown for ten times seven years. God will be no loser in his glory at last, by the disobedience of men. If they refused to let the land rest, God would make it rest. What place, O God, shall thy justice spare, if Jerusalem has perished? If that delight of thine were cut off for wickedness, let us not be high-minded, but fear.
(5) Jehoiakim . . . in Jerusalem.--2 Kings 23:36, adding the mother's name. here. So LXX.
And he did . . . the Lord.--2 Kings 23:37, which adds "according to all that his fathers had done." So LXX.
Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon.--Nabium-kudurri-ucur ("Nebo guard the crown! ") son of Nabopalassar, who had founded this dynasty by successful revolt against Assyria. His extant inscriptions chiefly relate to palace and temple building. Schrader gives a short inscription from a brick now in the Zrich Museum. "Nab--Kudurri-ucur, king of Babylon, restorer of Esagili and Ezida [two famous temples], son of Nab--abala-ucur, King of Babylon am I." No really historical inscription is known except a fragment relating to his Egyptian campaign in his 37th year (568 B.C. ), and an illegible one on the rocks of Nahr-el-Kelb near Beirut. The LXX. here interpolates the account of Jehoiakim's three years of vassalage, and his revolt against Nebuchadnezzar, and the other events and reflections contained in 2 Kings 24:1-4. The LXX. makes Jehoiakim, instead of Manasseh, "fill Jerusalem with innocent blood," contrary to the Hebrew text.
And bound him in fetters.--Two bronze (chains), as in 2 Chronicles 33:11.
To carry him to Babylon.--To make him go. It is not said that this intention was carried out. (Comp. 2 Chronicles 33:11, "and carried him to Babylon.") Nebuchadnezzar, who, according to Jeremiah 46:2, had defeated Necho in a great battle at Carchemish, in the 4th year of Jehoiakim, appears to have left the king of Judah to reign as a vassal-king, after inflicting upon him a severe humiliation. (The LXX., 3 Esdr., Vulg., and Arabic, but not the Syriac, read: "and carried him to Babylon.") Thenius says this must be the right reading, and then denies its claim to credibility. He further asserts that, "in order to allow ample scope for the fulfilment of the prophecy of Jeremiah" (see Note on 2 Chronicles 36:8), the chronicler has represented Jehoiakim as carried alive to Babylon in the last year of his reign. This statement rests not upon objective historical grounds, but upon subjective prejudices against the chronicler.
Daniel 1:1, by a transcriber's error, puts this first capture of Jerusalem by Nebuchadnezzar in the third year of Jehoiakim; whereas Nebuchadnezzar only became king in the fourth of Jehoiakim. (2 Kings 25:8; Jeremiah 25:1.)