Esther 9:10

“The ten sons of Haman the son of Hammedatha, the enemy of the Jews, slew they; but on the spoil laid they not their hand.”

King James Version (KJV)

Other Translations for Esther 9:10

The ten sonnes of Haman the sonne of Hammedatha, the enemie of the Iewes, slew they, but on the spoile laid they not their hand.
- King James Version (1611) - View 1611 Bible Scan

the ten sons of Haman the son of Hammedatha, the Jews' enemy; but they did not lay their hands on the plunder.
- New American Standard Version (1995)

the ten sons of Haman the son of Hammedatha, the Jew's enemy, slew they; but on the spoil they laid not their hand.
- American Standard Version (1901)

The ten sons of Haman the son of Hammedatha, the hater of the Jews; but they put not a hand on any of their goods.
- Basic English Bible

the ten sons of Haman the son of Hammedatha, the oppressor of the Jews, they slew; but they laid not their hands on the prey.
- Darby Bible

The ten sons of Haman the son of Hammedatha, the enemy of the Jews, they slew; but on the spoil they laid not their hand.
- Webster's Bible

the ten sons of Haman the son of Hammedatha, the Jew's enemy, but they didn't lay their hand on the plunder.
- World English Bible

ten sons of Haman son of Hammedatha, adversary of the Jews, they have slain, and on the prey they have not put forth their hand.
- Youngs Literal Bible

the ten sons of Haman the son of Hammedatha, the Jews' enemy, slew they; but on the spoil they laid not their hand.
- Jewish Publication Society Bible

Bible Commentary for Esther 9:10

Wesley's Notes for Esther 9:10


9:10 But, &c. - Because they would leave it to their children, that it might appear what they did was not done out of malice, or covetousness, but out of mere necessity, and by that great law of self - preservation.


View more Esther 9:10 meaning, interpretation, and commentary...

Esther 9:10 meaning
 

Discussion for Esther 9

View All