| << | Deuteronomy Chapter 22 (1611 Bible) |
>> |
Viewing the 1611 King James Version. Click to switch to Standard King James Version of Deuteronomy Chapter 22
Why does the spelling look unusual?

View original 1611 Bible scan for Deuteronomy chapter 22
(this is a scan from the exact, authentic, original 1611 'HE' King James Bible)
10 ¶ Thou shalt not plow with an oxe and an asse together.
11 ¶ Thou shalt not weare a garment of diuers sorts, as of woollen, and linnen together.
13 ¶ If any man take a wife, and go in vnto her, and hate her,
18 And the Elders of that citie shall take that man, and chastise him.
20 But if this thing be true, and the tokens of virginitie be not found for the damosel:
27 For he found her in the field, and the betrothed damosel cried, and there was none to saue her.
30 ¶ A man shall not take his fathers wife, nor discouer his fathers skirt.
Help share God's Word with others...
|
|
| < Deuteronomy Chapter 21 |
View All Deuteronomy Chapter 22 Comments...
George's Deuteronomy Chapter 22 comment about verse 5 on 5/18/2013, 3:43am...
Please kindly enlighten me more about the name Joan. Where can it be found in the bible. I have a new born baby girl and I am suggesting that name for her. I really need your assistance on this. Kindly treat as urgent.
RICHARD WALTON's Deuteronomy Chapter 22 comment on 4/19/2013, 9:31am...
Is it wrong therefore to wear a kilt as men in SCotland do
AJ's Deuteronomy Chapter 22 comment about verse 5 on 3/12/2013, 12:03pm...
@Yemmy,
We need to have these discussions, because there are people like me, that have grown up thinking, what I wore is what would determine whether I make it into heaven. Please be patient as God uses people like you and these discussions to persuade me to trust Him.
@Steve,
You're proving Jacque’s point. It's not necessarily WHAT we wear, but the attitude behind it. Women began to wear pants to show that "what a man can do, a woman can do even better!" Some aren't satisfied to just wear pants, but want to be sexy to attract attention. I know all scripture is profitable, but I'm in the process of reading the words that came out of Jesus' mouth (red letters) I want to know what was important enough for Jesus to speak. I know all scripture is profitable.
Bryant Fry's Deuteronomy Chapter 22 comment about verse 5 on 3/03/2013, 9:11pm...
Moses here is speaking of the identity of the two genders, and it is a comparison to nature. Paul in 1 Corinthians 11:14-15 is reiterating the same principle in the church age that we read here in this passage. Just as we are not to change the identity of the genders for any reason, so Paul is saying the same thing in the New Testament. Consider this: God made the gender differences a very important part of our lives. He made the distinctions, not man. He designed the distinctions in hair lengths, and the distinctions in clothing, not man. This nature was established in Genesis and carries through to the book of Revelation and beyond. 1 Corinthians 14:33 “For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints." God still expects us to follow His standards. Here are examples of how God's standards haven't changed: “I clothe the heavens with blackness, and I make sackcloth their covering (Isaiah 50:3).”
“ Wherefore, if God so clothe the grass of the field, which to day is, and to morrow is cast into the oven, shall he not much more clothe you, O ye of little faith? (Matthew 6:30)”
“If then God so clothe the grass, which is to day in the field, and to morrow is cast into the oven; how much more will he clothe you, O ye of little faith (Luke 12:28)?”
Isaiah tells us how God clothed the heavens, and continues to do so. In the Matthew and Luke passages, we see that God still has the same nature for grasses that existed thousands of years ago.
Bro Lemogang's Deuteronomy Chapter 22 comment on 3/01/2013, 9:18am...
@Benedict,
Before I can start anything, let me ask does God ever change or is he the same yesterday, today and forever? Or does he ever change his Word, Will, Laws?
Emmanuel King's Deuteronomy Chapter 22 comment about verse 5 on 2/27/2013, 6:05am...
Before we say anything, we should ask God for knowledge. My knowledge and understanding is, there were no trousers for even men when this command was given by God. So to me, it remains simple; a man must not wear what belong to his wife and women what belong to their husbands, or a man must not wear what has been worn by a woman and vice versa. God is spirit and they that worship him, must worship him in spirit and in truth. What a man wears cannot destroy the soul but the sin you do with your mind and heart like theft, fornication, adultery and the likes. May God give us wisdom and understanding of his works. Amen
Eric Obika's Deuteronomy Chapter 22 comment about verse 5 on 2/18/2013, 3:22pm...
Deuteronomy 22:5 is quite clear for the understanding of the simple but our ignorance may not allow our horizon to be broadened. At first, what pertaineth to an opposite sex is abnormal to be worn. How can my girlfriend wear my clothe? It’s wrong! Any clothe that has been worn by a man should not be repeated by a woman. We are different in physique and nature therefore we shouldn't interwear clothes, that's my understanding of the verse. Those saying that women wearing trouser is a sin should read again with understanding. When God gave the command, there was no disparity in terms of clothing. Both sexes wear ropes but that which has been worn by a man should not be worn by a woman. Keep faith!
Joshua's Deuteronomy Chapter 22 comment about verse 5 on 2/06/2013, 4:33pm...
@B B,
You can’t tell me your heart is clean and you commit abomination. Out of the abundance of the heart, the mouth speaketh. So, you can only show out what's inside you.
View All Deuteronomy Chapter 22 Comments...
What Do You Think of Deuteronomy 22?
Share your own thoughts or commentary here...
| < Deuteronomy Chapter 21 |
